----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2953/#review6890 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Thanks for the updates! - Jason Power On Aug. 3, 2015, 3:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2953/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 3, 2015, 3:23 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 10995:3e7942da8ea3 > --------------------------- > ruby: handle llsc accesses through CacheEntry, not CacheMemory > > The sequencer takes care of llsc accesses by calling upon functions > from the CacheMemory. This is unnecessary once the required CacheEntry object > is available. Thus some of the calls to findTagInSet() are avoided. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractCacheEntry.hh a618349a7953 > src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractCacheEntry.cc a618349a7953 > src/mem/ruby/structures/CacheMemory.hh a618349a7953 > src/mem/ruby/structures/CacheMemory.cc a618349a7953 > src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc a618349a7953 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2953/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nilay Vaish > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
