-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3002/#review6938
-----------------------------------------------------------


I think this is a really smart patch, and hope that Brad will agree. Below are 
a few small things that would be good to address.


src/mem/slicc/ast/ObjDeclAST.py 
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3002/#comment5964>

    Does this change belong in this patch? Seems unrelated.



src/mem/slicc/ast/PeekStatementAST.py (line 52)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3002/#comment5972>

    Remove "_ptr" for consistency? Other places?



src/mem/slicc/symbols/StateMachine.py 
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3002/#comment5969>

    A quick grep indicates that the primitive variable tag may no longer be 
necessary in SLICC. If so, can you remove it from the rest of the code?


- Joel Hestness


On Aug. 3, 2015, 12:15 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3002/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 3, 2015, 12:15 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11017:b37918d5063f
> ---------------------------
> ruby: slicc: fix naming of variables
> 
> The way SLICC compiler has been written, it was difficult to use a variable
> that appears in the base class AbstractController without adding some special
> code to the file src/mem/slicc/ast/ObjDeclAST.py.  This eliminates the need 
> for
> any such special code.  The problem ultimately turned out to be the way SLICC
> handles pointer and non-pointer variables.  Till now, SLICC tried to handle
> everything using pointers, unless some special rules were specified, as was
> being done for three variables: version, machineID and clusterID.  Now the Var
> class will have a field that indicates whether a variable is pointer or not.
> This field is used to differentiate between pointer variables and other
> variables.  Pointer-based variables are allocated in the init() function of 
> the
> controller, as was the case before.  Other variables now need not be pointer
> based.  Variables that need the constructor be called on them will now
> necessarily be declared as pointers.  The protocols currently in gem5 have 
> been
> changed accordingly.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/InPortDeclAST.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/LocalVariableAST.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-dma.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_token-L1cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_token-L2cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_token-dir.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_hammer-cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_hammer-dir.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/ActionDeclAST.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/EnqueueStatementAST.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/FormalParamAST.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_Three_Level-L0cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_Three_Level-L1cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_Two_Level-L1cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_Two_Level-L2cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_Two_Level-dir.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MI_example-cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MI_example-dir.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-L1cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-L2cache.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-dir.sm a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/ObjDeclAST.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/OutPortDeclAST.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/PeekStatementAST.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/symbols/StateMachine.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/symbols/Type.py a618349a7953 
>   src/mem/slicc/symbols/Var.py a618349a7953 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3002/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nilay Vaish
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to