----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3032/#review7222 -----------------------------------------------------------
Any feedback from the GPU fanbois out there? Perhaps someone can use the patch as an excuse to get a R9 Fury and do some correlation... - Andreas Hansson On Aug. 12, 2015, 5:38 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3032/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 12, 2015, 5:38 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Created the following HBM configurations: > 1) HBM gen1 (x128/CH), 2Gb die, 4H stack, 1Gbps, 8 channels > 2) HBM gen2 (x64/PC), 8Gb die, 4H stack, 1Gbps, 16 pseudo-channels > > The configuration values are based on: > - The HBM gen1 public JEDEC spec > - Publically released data from MemCon presentations > - Timing extrapolated from existing LPDDR configurations > > Will adjust once specs become available. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/DRAMCtrl.py b998b5a6c5f59b41e0c0997ca1bebe37717ad551 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3032/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Curtis Dunham > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
