-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3142/#review7341
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/sim/debug.cc (line 95)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3142/#comment6204>

    hate to nitpick over such a small function, but why not just 
'schedBread(curTick() + delta);'?


- Steve Reinhardt


On Oct. 5, 2015, 3:50 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3142/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 5, 2015, 3:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Allow schedBreak() to set a breakpoint by relative rather than absolute tick.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/sim/debug.hh bc07f37641295bfb302950805393872d00ce68ee 
>   src/sim/debug.cc bc07f37641295bfb302950805393872d00ce68ee 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3142/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Curtis Dunham
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to