> On Aug. 28, 2015, 3:21 p.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > I think this idea makes sense. I was doing something similar when I added 
> > [forking](https://github.com/andysan/gem5/commits/fork), specifically this 
> > [commit](https://github.com/andysan/gem5/commit/cbbba06a4ddbbc6c7571f8b4e92a41e36c9fc038])
> >  adds a similar mechanism for forked child processes. I ended up using 
> > Python's string substitution system and a dictionary with multiple 
> > substitution variables. For PIDs, I would've used something like this: 
> > "m5out.%(pid)s". This has the additional benefit of not clashing with the 
> > shell's substitution system.
> > 
> > I plan to rebase and submit the patches sometime soonish. Would it make 
> > sense to try to consistently use the same type of substitution in both 
> > cases?
> 
> Steve Reinhardt wrote:
>     Did these patches ever get submitted?  I don't recall seeing them.  
> Unless something is going to change soon, I'd like to submit this patch.
>     
>     Note that I used '$$' to be consistent with shell syntax, not to clash 
> with it... true that it does require quoting if you put it on the command 
> line, but it doesn't if you put it in the .m5/options.py file, and it has the 
> advantage that it's easy to remember.

We have rebased the forking patches and I plan to submit them as soon as I'm 
back from X-mas holidays. I expect I'll submit the patches around the 11th. I 
would really like to avoid having two slightly different substitution systems 
in place, so I'd appreciate it if you could have a look at the patches on 
[GitHub](https://github.com/andysan/gem5/commit/cbbba06a4ddbbc6c7571f8b4e92a41e36c9fc038)
 and use the same syntax in this patch.


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3072/#review7072
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 24, 2015, 7:55 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3072/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 24, 2015, 7:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11060:06c8c441324a
> ---------------------------
> sim: enable adding pid to output directory name
> 
> With a fixed output directory name, running concurrent gem5 jobs
> in the same directory causes jobs to overwrite each other's output.
> Worse, for some upcoming changes where the output directory is
> used to hold redirected file I/O, having concurrent jobs share the
> same directory can cause crashes.
> 
> This patch enables easier generation of unique output directories
> by replacing any occurrence of '$$' in the output directory name
> with the gem5 process ID.  PID-specific output dirs can be enabled
> by default by overriding the 'm5out' default in the user's
> .m5/options.py file, as described in the comment.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/python/m5/main.py 842f56345a421244a7a8988a5bc4fb1cfbf409ef 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3072/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Reinhardt
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to