----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3357/#review8058 -----------------------------------------------------------
Could you add some details to the commit message about why you need to access pkt from slicc? - Jason Lowe-Power On March 4, 2016, 6:21 p.m., Matthew Poremba wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3357/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 4, 2016, 6:21 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 11354:804bd6c89496 > --------------------------- > ruby: Rename pkt to m_pkt so it may be accessed via SLICC > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/protocol/RubySlicc_Types.sm > 31c5786945b447b372c3b7d346aea8fa6208577c > src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/RubyRequest.hh > 31c5786945b447b372c3b7d346aea8fa6208577c > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3357/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Matthew Poremba > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
