----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3378/#review8101 -----------------------------------------------------------
SConstruct (line 798) <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3378/#comment6985> i am surprised to not see this change in util/regress as well should we parametrise the name rather? SConstruct (line 964) <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3378/#comment6986> should we just replace the check for message.h rather? - Andreas Hansson On March 15, 2016, 5:01 p.m., Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3378/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 15, 2016, 5:01 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > scons: make build better on FreeBSD > > Various changes we found needed to build gem5 successfully on > FreeBSD. > > > Diffs > ----- > > SConstruct 2fd64ea0a7cb > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3378/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern A. Zeeb > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
