----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3429/#review8226 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! We really should be using the same interface for CacheMemory, DirectoryMemory, and PerfectCacheMemory, and this is a step in the right direction. Thanks for tackling this! - Joel Hestness On April 4, 2016, 11:42 p.m., Brandon Potter wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3429/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 4, 2016, 11:42 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 11431:88018e899f82 > --------------------------- > ruby: PerfectCache changes so that we can create with new > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/ruby/structures/PerfectCacheMemory.hh > cfad34a15729e1d5e096245f5a80ded6e2c379ca > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3429/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Brandon Potter > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
