Fine with us.

Steve


On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:54 AM Andreas Hansson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Did we converge on this?
>
> Is everyone happy to bump the official requirement to gcc 4.8?
>
> Andreas
>
> On 18/04/2016, 14:53, "gem5-dev on behalf of Curtis Dunham"
> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Sorry for the rogue Ctrl-Enter folks:
> >I'll forgo the citation on the PCI stuff but std::map only got the
> >emplace() method in g++ 4.8, and we rely on it.
> >
> >We might as well make it official that we require gcc 4.8.
> >
> >
> >Curtis
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Curtis Dunham
> >Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 2:51 PM
> >To: gem5 Developer List
> >Subject: RE: [gem5-dev] gem5 not building with gcc-4.7 -- bump required
> >gcc version?
> >
> >Hi all,
> >I would also suggest that we bump the minimum gcc version to 4.8.
> >
> >In December, we had two changes that require 4.8+, namely the change
> >mentioned below [1] (additional gcc reference [2]), and the new PCI
> >support
> >
> >
> >[1] http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/d9a0136ab8cc
> >[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
> >[3]
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: gem5-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve
> >Reinhardt
> >Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 5:13 AM
> >To: gem5 Developer List
> >Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] gem5 not building with gcc-4.7 -- bump required
> >gcc version?
> >
> >Hi Lena,
> >
> >You are right about inheriting constructors not being available until 4.8:
> >
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/cxx0x_status.html
> >
> >I'd say the key question is whether there are people out there who would
> >have difficulty moving to 4.8 as the minimum rev.  Ubuntu 14.04 LTS has
> >been out for almost two years and the default version on that platform is
> >4.8.  Are there other platforms in common use that don't easily support
> >4.8?
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:47 PM Lena Olson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It looks like with changeset d9a0136ab8cc (which was review request
> >>3207,
> >> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3207), I can no longer build gem5 with gcc
> >> 4.7.3.  I think inheriting constructors with "using" is not available
> >>until
> >> 4.8.
> >>
> >> Does it make sense to bump the required version of gcc?  Or to modify
> >>the
> >> remote_gdb.hh files to work with older versions?
> >>
> >> The error I'm seeing:
> >> In file included from build/X86/arch/x86/remote_gdb.cc:52:0:
> >> build/X86/arch/x86/remote_gdb.hh:63:30: error:
> >> 'BaseRemoteGDB::BaseGdbRegCache::BaseGdbRegCache' names constructor
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Lena
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gem5-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >gem5-dev mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> >IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> >confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> >recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> >contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
> >the information in any medium. Thank you.
> >_______________________________________________
> >gem5-dev mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to