----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3575/#review8536 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Thanks for posting this. We actually have a very similar patch in our internal patch queue here at AMD. This is a good reminder that we need to get our patches out there publicly. - Brad Beckmann On July 22, 2016, 3:47 p.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3575/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 22, 2016, 3:47 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 11573:d18fec611bbd > --------------------------- > ruby: Implement support for functional accesses to PIO ranges > > There are cases where we want to put boot ROMs on the PIO bus. Ruby > currently doesn't support functional accesses to such memories since > functional accesses are always assumed to go to physical memory. Add > the required support for routing functional accesses to the PIO bus. > > Change-Id: Ia5b0fcbe87b9642bfd6ff98a55f71909d1a804e3 > Signed-off-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandb...@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikole...@arm.com> > > > Diffs > ----- > > configs/ruby/Ruby.py 4aac82f10951 > src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc 4aac82f10951 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3575/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Andreas Sandberg > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
