> On Aug. 12, 2016, 2:35 p.m., Matthias Jung wrote:
> > Technically everything seams right. However, I think the x8 configuration 
> > could also be interesting as an default option. E.g. when people want to 
> > see the effect on their application when having more **banks** (16). I 
> > suggest to keep both configuration: one as _device_x16_ and another one 
> > _device_x8_.

Hi Matthias,
I agree that the x8 (and x4) configurations are more interesting.  Now that we 
have public datasheets for all device widths, we have an internal patch that we 
will upload shortly that contains updated configurations to address your 
concern.
Will this suffice?

Thanks,
Wendy


- Wendy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3596/#review8606
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 11, 2016, 9:07 a.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3596/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 11, 2016, 9:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default and Matthias Jung.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> mem: make DDR4 x16
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/DRAMCtrl.py e9096175eb38ac39f37c91bfdf2a450b9664e222 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3596/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Curtis Dunham
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to