Hi Rekai,

I too would love to see someone knowledgeable in other architectures,
especially x86, take a look at these patches. Unfortunately, I'm not sure
who we have around that either has the knowledge to do this, or has the
time.

I'll take a stab at it soon, though I don't know much about the ISA parser
or x86 implementation. But I'll try to provide any feedback I can.

Thanks for the contribution!

Jason


On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:53 AM Rekai Gonzalez Alberquilla <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello again,
>    I have gone through a round of review of the patches I submitted before
> Christmas, as in the rebasing I missed a couple things that made some
> regressions fail, and they were also some style mistakes. The patches
> concerned are: 3754, 3756, 3757, 3758 and 3760.
>    I would really appreciate it if someone knowledgeable about the arch
> modeling, specially someone knowledgeable on non-ARM architectures, could
> spare some time to take a look for wrong assumptions or shortcomings, in
> the code.
> Cheers,
> Rekai
>
> PS: Links to ease the navigation:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3754/
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3756/
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3757/
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3758/
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3760/
>
>
>
> From: Rekai Gonzalez Alberquilla
> Sent: 10 December 2016 15:46
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Vector register file
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
>    Yesterday I submitted five patches to the review board. The idea of the
> patches is to implement a proper vector register file. To enable cleaner
> implementations of the SIMD ISAs.
>
>
>
> The first patch extends what Nathanael Premillieu did in spring, taking
> the hierarchical RegIds, and generalising the usage of them.
>
>
>
> The second patch is an 'enabler'. It is a refactorisation of the
> InstResult, as having Vector Regs, and being able to define operations that
> operate on a vector register, we need to contemplate the possibility of
> instructions generating vector results. There are a couple points in the
> code that require bearing in mind that this change is right before adding
> vector registers to make sense.
>
>
>
> The third patch adds the vector register class. For the implementation we
> decided to decouple the uarch entity that is the register, codified in the
> VecRegContainer class, which is just a group of bytes, from the
> interpretation of it, which belongs to the arch world. To do that,
> VecRegContainers have methods to create a view of the bytes as a vector of
> any plain type. This views, VecRegT have the expected functionality to
> inspect and modify the contents of the register.
>
>
>
> The fourth patch (cpu: Added interface for vector reg file) creates a
> vector register file in the cpu models, and adds all the interface
> functions required across classes that implement ThreadContext or
> ExecContext interfaces. The rename is extended. Due to the particularities
> of some ISAs, the same set of registers can be accessed at register level,
> or at 'native element' level. Therefore, the rename stage and the rename
> map are updated in this patch to address that need. One particularly odd
> piece of functionality is a function to change the mode, as different
> 'chunks' may need to be consolidated into one physical vector register to
> preserve ISA semantics.
>
>
>
> Finally, the last patch proposes updates to the parsing of the operands in
> Neon instructions for ARM to use the newly added Vector Register file.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rekai
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
-- 

Jason
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to