> On Jan. 18, 2017, 4:04 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > tests/test-progs/insttest/src/riscv/rv64i.cpp, line 238 > > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/diff/1/?file=64383#file64383line238> > > > > Can you block-comment instead of delete? I think we'll want to add this > > back in sometime in the relatively near future (e.g., when we have > > functional-only tests).
Thanks! - Jason ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/#review9260 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 18, 2017, 4:42 p.m., Alec Roelke wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 18, 2017, 4:42 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 11796:aaf914ea5a83 > --------------------------- > riscv: Remove ECALL tests from insttest > > The system calls tested in rv64i.cpp in RISC-V's insttest suite have > different behavior depending on the operating system and file system they > are run on. This patch removes those tests from the regression. > > [Change deletion of ECALL test to block comment.] > > > Diffs > ----- > > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/minor-timing/stats.txt > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-atomic/config.ini > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-atomic/config.json > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-atomic/simout > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-atomic/stats.txt > 97eebddaae84 > > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing-ruby/config.ini > 97eebddaae84 > > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing-ruby/config.json > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing-ruby/simout > 97eebddaae84 > > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing-ruby/stats.txt > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing/config.ini > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing/config.json > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing/simout > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing/stats.txt > 97eebddaae84 > tests/test-progs/insttest/src/riscv/rv64i.cpp 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/minor-timing/config.ini > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/minor-timing/config.json > 97eebddaae84 > tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/minor-timing/simout > 97eebddaae84 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Alec Roelke > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev