> On Jan. 18, 2017, 4:04 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote:
> > tests/test-progs/insttest/src/riscv/rv64i.cpp, line 238
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/diff/1/?file=64383#file64383line238>
> >
> >     Can you block-comment instead of delete? I think we'll want to add this 
> > back in sometime in the relatively near future (e.g., when we have 
> > functional-only tests).

Thanks!


- Jason


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/#review9260
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 18, 2017, 4:42 p.m., Alec Roelke wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 18, 2017, 4:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11796:aaf914ea5a83
> ---------------------------
> riscv: Remove ECALL tests from insttest
> 
> The system calls tested in rv64i.cpp in RISC-V's insttest suite have
> different behavior depending on the operating system and file system they
> are run on. This patch removes those tests from the regression.
> 
> [Change deletion of ECALL test to block comment.]
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/minor-timing/stats.txt 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-atomic/config.ini 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-atomic/config.json 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-atomic/simout 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-atomic/stats.txt 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   
> tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing-ruby/config.ini
>  97eebddaae84 
>   
> tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing-ruby/config.json
>  97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing-ruby/simout 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   
> tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing-ruby/stats.txt 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing/config.ini 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing/config.json 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing/simout 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/simple-timing/stats.txt 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/test-progs/insttest/src/riscv/rv64i.cpp 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/minor-timing/config.ini 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/minor-timing/config.json 
> 97eebddaae84 
>   tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/riscv/linux-rv64i/minor-timing/simout 
> 97eebddaae84 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alec Roelke
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to