----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3798/#review9355 -----------------------------------------------------------
I don't follow why you don't need to pay for the payload delay. Is that taken care of at some other point in the System-C model? - Jason Lowe-Power On Jan. 30, 2017, 4:40 p.m., Christian Menard wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3798/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 30, 2017, 4:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 11802:93cbf8202c63 > --------------------------- > misc: Clean up and complete the gem5<->SystemC-TLM bridge [9/6] > > The current TLM bridge only provides a Slave Port that allows the gem5 world > to > send request to the SystemC world. This patch series refractors and cleans up > the existing code, and adds a Master Port that allows the SystemC world to > send > requests to the gem5 world. > > This patch: > * Pay the header delay that the gem5 XBar annotates to packets. > > > Diffs > ----- > > util/tlm/sc_master_port.cc PRE-CREATION > util/tlm/sc_slave_port.cc PRE-CREATION > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3798/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Christian Menard > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
