Hello folks. I've noticed once or twice when attempting to use an
alternative build root that the mkdir command which tries to create said
build_root will fail if anything other than the actual "build/" part of the
path is missing. I can see why that might be intentional (avoiding silently
accepted typos, rogue build dirs, etc.), but also that it might not.

Is the preferred behavior what it's already doing, or should it make all
elements of the path that might be missing?

Gabe
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to