How would this work from the perspective of the object files and
incremental builds? Suppose I build the opt variant and then the debug
variant, change a file, then rebuild the opt variant. Would the entire opt
variant need to be rebuilt because the debug variant blew away all of those
object files, or would incremental builds be possible now with this
separation?

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017, 12:28 AM Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi folks. I've been digging around in the scons files, and I was thinking
> about the possibility of treating opt, fast, debug, etc., as actual
> variants from the scons perspective instead of having them all live in the
> same directory but with different extensions. I think the biggest
> difference this might make is that, for instance, the opt version of the
> gem5 X86 binary would be build/X86/opt/gem5 and not build/X86/gem5.opt.
>
> There wouldn't be any amazing direct benefit from doing things that way
> that I can see at the moment, but it would make our build structure fit a
> little more naturally into the way scons wants to do things. It might also
> make it more feasible to use real scons builders for things like Source,
> etc., instead of wrapper classes. Another benefit would be if you wanted to
> compile all the files in a particular part of the source tree (like the
> unit tests, although those shouldn't be lumped together anyway), you could
> just give scons the path and it wouldn't build all possible versions of the
> sources in that directory, just the one in the variant you gave it. Using
> the unit tests as an example, you could run 'scons build/ARM/opt/unittest'
> and get the opt versions of all the unit tests.
>
> Any objections?
>
> Gabe
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

-- 
Thanks,

Sam Xi
Harvard University
Computer Science, Ph.D. Candidate
http://www.samxi.org
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to