Hi An alternative solution could be to flag these commits with "pending adoption." In the past, I've been interested in pending commits, and I've added them to my watchlist, waiting to know the outcome. In other cases, I have personally used a commit waiting to be submitted (for example, all the patches related to the serialization of LFENCE).
If a patch is "waiting for the adoption," for example, as with orphan packages in the Debian project, some developers will likely adopt it to fix any conflicts and eventually expand it with their further changes. my two cents Il giorno 5 ott 2019, alle ore 02:21, Ciro Santilli <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto: 1) What is the advantage of abandoning changes? Could reviewers just remove themselves from the reviewer list if they're not interested in the patch? Maybe mark as WIP instead of abandoning. I generally dislike when websites / communities close my stuff. Bests, A. _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
