Thanks for the suggestions. I think SyscallEmu is a bit too long as a prefix, but I do like Emu (even though EmuLinux sounds like it's a linux distro for these guys https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emu). I'd like to move away from the idea of a syscall emulation *mode* since it's no longer a separate build of gem5, and I want that to be an emergent set of behaviors or a common configuration, not necessarily a distinct mode of operation. I don't think the name is *too* important, but I'd want it to be descriptive and not confusing. I think there are some good options here. Thanks!
Gabe On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:07 AM Bjoern A. Zeeb < [email protected]> wrote: > On 10 Dec 2019, at 17:14, Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > > One option is gem5Linux since it is kind of "gem5 flavored" Linux. > > > > SELinux isn't that bad. I doubt too many people will think that gem5 > > is implementing a secure linux ;). > > > > Other options: > > EmuLinux (surprisingly doesn't return anything on Google except qemu) > > SEModeLinux > > SEOnlyLinux > > > > After thinking about it for a few minutes, I don't think the name is > > *too* important. I'd be ok with anything :) > > I was going to suggest making it a Suffix: LinuxSE, I’d assume > there’d be a FreeBSDSE and others as well. Now, I don’t know what > the people in Sweden will think of that ;-) > > Otherwise I’d spell it CaMelCaSe: SyscallEmuLinux, SyscallEmuFreeBSD, > .. for a C++/Python class name that doesn’t sound too bad. > > /bz > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
