I think I asked for sufficient access to turn them off a long time ago :-). Even if someone is looking at them religiously, I don't think there's any information to glean from them.
I have occasionally used them to look up a scons target to run a particular regression from time to time. twolf is handy way to benchmark gem5 itself for instance, since it runs pretty quickly but not too quickly. Existing emails are sufficient for that though. Gabe On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:53 PM Matt Sinclair <[email protected]> wrote: > I just delete them, basically same as Steve. > > Matt > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 5:51 PM Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I do not look at the emails :). > > > > Steve > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:19 PM Jason Lowe-Power <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Does anyone have a reason to continue running the nightly > > > builds/regressions on zizzer? Are the results used by anyone? As far > as I > > > can tell all of the tests either fail, are changed, or just don't build > > :/. > > > > > > We're going to have a replacement *very soon* (see > > > https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-197). However, if no one is > > looking > > > at the current emails, we might as well stop the spam :). > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Jason > > > _______________________________________________ > > > gem5-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > gem5-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > -- > Regards, > Matt Sinclair > Assistant Professor > University of Wisconsin-Madison > Computer Sciences Department > cs.wisc.edu/~sinclair > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
