Fine with me... I agree it's not clear why they're sticky. Wasn't there a time originally when all the options were sticky? Maybe they date back to that time, and never got moved over when we added the ability to have non-sticky options.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM, nathan binkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any objection to me making BATCH (and BATCH_CMD?) non-sticky options? > The reason is that when I use distcc to compile but find an error, I > then want to compile without distcc. > > I know that I could just set BATCH to false in the next one, but I > don't quite understand why sticky is the right way to go. > > Nate > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
