>> How about instead of Params.some_class the syntax would be >> Params(some_class) where Params is more like a class than a module? Then >> you could look up the information for the class you're dealing with >> without ever having to give it a globally consistent name. > > Seems reasonable to me... I don't remember why we went with the > current syntax instead of that... Nate?
I'm not clear what exactly you're suggesting. Do you mean like Param.String and Param.LiveProcess? I'm missing some context or something. _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
