I do think nested namespaces will work.  When you do cxx_namespace,
you'd just say "one::two::three"

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Nate will have to say if Nested namespaces will work for SimObjects.
> Perhaps a namespace like x86pc or something would be good for the tables.
> I'm pretty sure most of that stuff is x86 only.
>
> Ali
>
> On Jun 2, 2008, at 9:53 PM, Gabe Black wrote:
>
>> This stuff is standardized for PCs but it might be useful for other
>> platforms as well. I'm not familiar enough with this stuff to really be able
>> to tell for sure, but if I had to guess I'd say it's not. I was thinking of
>> putting it in X86ISA and then into a nested BIOS namespace.
>>
>> Gabe
>>
>> Ali Saidi wrote:
>>>
>>> Take a look at how the Alpha TLB is done for how to make
>>> SimObjects/Python happy with namespaces. The Params builder function needs
>>> to be in the global name space.
>>>
>>> One question is should it go in the x86 name space or in something else?
>>>
>>> Ali
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 2, 2008, at 9:32 PM, Gabe Black wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I'm just starting on making the BIOSey tables and configuration
>>>> information, like the e820 map which was forcing there to be 4 gigs of
>>>> memory, available through SimObjects. There are a bunch of hierarchical
>>>> tables for, for example, the DMI information, and I'm concerned that if I
>>>> add a bunch, maybe a few dozen, new names, I'll end up either colliding 
>>>> with
>>>> things that exist or making collisions more likely later on. The obvious 
>>>> C++
>>>> answer to that would be a namespace, but I'm not sure the best way to do
>>>> that in this circumstance. Regularly I think the python modules idea is
>>>> supposed to take care of this, but I'm not sure how that fits with our 
>>>> stuff
>>>> and some of the fancy voodoo we've got making it all work. I'm going to try
>>>> it that way and just see how it pans out, but if anyone has any input I'd
>>>> like to hear it.
>>>>
>>>> Gabe
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> m5-dev mailing list
>>>> m5-dev@m5sim.org
>>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> m5-dev mailing list
>>> m5-dev@m5sim.org
>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-dev mailing list
>> m5-dev@m5sim.org
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to