I would say that it probably doesn't matter since I doubt anyone is using x86. We're trying to get a new stable release ready anyway, so we should probably just wait for that.
Ali On Sep 2, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > It's fine with me, since it probably doesn't touch anything that's > widely used... if no one else objects, I'd say go for it. > > Steve > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Gabe Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Specifying the right bus in the MP tables partially fixed the > > kernel's handling of interrupts, but there was also a semi-corner > case > > bug in how one of the instructions was microcoded which was also > > partially breaking things. I have a patch and I've verified it > fixes the > > problem, and I'm running the X86_SE regressions on zizzer to see if > > those changed and to update them if appropriate. > > > > My question is, should I push this into the stable repo? I'm > > thinking yes but I figured I'd check before needlessly causing > headaches. > > > > Gabe > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-dev mailing list > > m5-dev@m5sim.org > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > > > > Somebody? Anybody? > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
