nathan binkert wrote: >> I notice there's a copy of the m5 op stuff in both the main repository >> and in the kernel patches, and that the version in the kernel patches >> isn't the same. Should they be? Do I need to link them together somehow? >> The version in the main repository has some definitions for functions >> the other one doesn't, I think basically the reserved opcodes for >> definition by a user. Is there some rule about how the two should be >> synched up? >> > > The one in m5/util is pretty much always correct, and the one in the > linux repo should be synched with it when necessary. It's not always > critical since we mostly only add stuff to the interface. > > Nate > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > I have the M5 ops working, but the slow IDE controller turned out to be a bug in the rdtsc (read time stamp counter) instruction and a coincidence of timing. When making a blank image using the script on the website, there was a bug which was fairly easy to fix. There was one place where sudo was used directly instead of using the run_priv (right name?) function, so if you try to run as root without using sudo it won't work. I think it was on line 154, but I haven't looked at that for a day or two so that may be completely wrong. I still haven't actually ran anything off the image I made, but I've fixed a few problems and I'm getting closer. Happy holidays everybody!
Gabe _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
