> Yea, that's exactly the solution I was thinking of when I read the > first paragraph. It is a lot of code to change, but you could do it > all with one big regex replacement, so I don't think it's that big of > a hurdle. My gut preference is the function argument, so if you're not opposed to the big regex, I think I'll go for that. Out of curiosity, do you prefer it to stashing the eventq in the event? If so, why?
Do you think it's worth it? Anyone else care? Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
