On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:01 PM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yea, that's exactly the solution I was thinking of when I read the >> first paragraph. It is a lot of code to change, but you could do it >> all with one big regex replacement, so I don't think it's that big of >> a hurdle. > My gut preference is the function argument, so if you're not opposed > to the big regex, I think I'll go for that.
I'm not opposed at all. > Out of curiosity, do you > prefer it to stashing the eventq in the event? If so, why? Given that the information is right there in the caller, it seems a shame to blow 8 bytes in every single event (and the overhead of initializing those bytes) just to avoid a one-time global code update. Steve _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
