> I haven't looked at this in great detail (and don't plan to), but I'm > wondering: I don't know what the purpose of Allocator() was, but does it make > sense to replace it with FastAlloc rather than just leaving it to the default > allocator? I see where this would be a little more complicated since it > involves tracking down the classes that used Allocator and changing their > inheritance, but I figured I'd throw it out there. I'm fine with doing this > in a separate patch if it's a good idea.
I'm not opposed to this, but I'm not going to do it :) I think we need to gather some evidence that shows that FastAlloc is better than the built in allocator. Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
