-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/#review399
-----------------------------------------------------------


I think Steve covered most of the main points.  Please see my detailed comment 
below about when I think line numbers and function names are useful.

Brad


src/mem/protocol/RubySlicc_MemControl.sm
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/#comment535>

    I'll beat Nate to this.  :)  Try to avoid inserting and deleting random 
lines in files.  It cluters the diff and unecessarily makes merging harder.



src/mem/ruby/common/DataBlock.hh
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/#comment532>

    Spacing is off.  Are you using mistakingly using tabs?



src/mem/ruby/common/Debug.hh
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/#comment533>

    I agree with Steve's point that adding "__PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __FILE__, 
__LINE__" to every Ruby DPRINTF call is too cumbersome and we either need to 
remove it or define a macro that does it automatically.  Nilay, I think I might 
have confused you during our previous email conversations.  We definitely want 
to automatically include the function name, file, and line number for the 
SLICC/.sm debug statements...I've found that feature very useful in the past.  
However, I'm not sure we need it for the debug statements on the Ruby side.  
Nilay, if I understand your changes to SLICC correctly and recall from our 
previous conversations on this topic, these old ruby DEBUG macros relied on the 
ostream operator<< overloading, correct? That is why you now have the 
conditional statements in the SLICC that generate the correct DPRINTF line 
depending on the type.  Am I understanding the issues correctly?  If so, I 
think your solution for the SLICC generation of DPRINTF statements looks g
 ood.  I just think that we need to clean up the Ruby DPRINTF statements.
    



src/mem/ruby/common/NetDest.hh
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/#comment534>

    Spacing again.



src/mem/slicc/ast/FuncCallExprAST.py
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/#comment536>

    See long comment above.


- Brad


On 2010-10-19 17:30:48, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-10-19 17:30:48)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default and Ruby Reviewers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Ruby currently uses GEMS debug support with the enum character string map to 
> enable certain debug messages.  Meanwhile, M5 has debug print support that 
> works with scons. Compiling the m5.fast binary, the M5 debug statements are 
> removed, but the Ruby ones are not unless RUBY_DEBUG is not defined. This 
> patch moves Ruby to M5's debug print support.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/CheckTable.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/SConscript 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_CMP_directory-L1cache.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_CMP_directory-L2cache.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_CMP_directory-dir.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MI_example-cache.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MI_example-dir.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-L1cache.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-L2cache.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-dir.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-perfectDir.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_token-L1cache.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_token-L2cache.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_token-dir.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_hammer-cache.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/MOESI_hammer-dir.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/RubySlicc_Exports.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/RubySlicc_MemControl.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/protocol/RubySlicc_Types.sm 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/SConsopts 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/buffers/MessageBuffer.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/Address.hh 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/DataBlock.hh 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/Debug.hh 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/Debug.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/NetDest.hh 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/NetDest.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/NetworkInterface_d.cc 
> 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/Switch_d.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/flexible-pipeline/NetworkInterface.cc 
> 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/flexible-pipeline/Router.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/simple/PerfectSwitch.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/simple/Throttle.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/simple/Topology.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/Message.hh 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/NetworkMessage.hh 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/storebuffer/storebuffer.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/CacheMemory.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/DirectoryMemory.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/SConscript 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/SparseMemory.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/ruby/tester/RaceyPseudoThread.cc 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/slicc/ast/FuncCallExprAST.py 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/slicc/symbols/StateMachine.py 956ac83b0a58 
>   src/mem/slicc/symbols/Type.py 956ac83b0a58 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/277/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nilay
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to