I don't have time to look at it right now, but I've attached the directory that the error message is referring to.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Nilay Vaish <ni...@cs.wisc.edu> wrote: > Can some one try applying the attached diff? It touches only > src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-* files. Review Board is failing in > applying this diff. I tried and it works correctly. This is the output from > Review Board -- > > The patch to 'src/mem/protocol/MOESI_CMP_directory-L1cache.sm' didn't apply > cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.3s7DQ8' for > debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file > /tmp/reviewboard.3s7DQ8/tmpAp0ogH Hunk #1 succeeded at 6 with fuzz 2 (offset > -130 lines). Hunk #2 FAILED at 150. Hunk #3 FAILED at 184. Hunk #4 FAILED at > 272. Hunk #5 FAILED at 289. Hunk #6 FAILED at 306. Hunk #7 FAILED at 335. > Hunk #8 FAILED at 353. Hunk #9 FAILED at 373. Hunk #10 FAILED at 380. Hunk > #11 FAILED at 393. Hunk #12 FAILED at 425. Hunk #13 FAILED at 440. Hunk #14 > FAILED at 479. Hunk #15 FAILED at 493. Hunk #16 FAILED at 511. Hunk #17 > FAILED at 529. Hunk #18 FAILED at 543. Hunk #19 FAILED at 597. Hunk #20 > FAILED at 604. Hunk #21 FAILED at 640. Hunk #22 FAILED at 655. Hunk #23 > FAILED at 676. Hunk #24 FAILED at 690. Hunk #25 FAILED at 708. Hunk #26 > FAILED at 721. Hunk #27 FAILED at 739. Hunk #28 FAILED at 768. Hunk #29 > FAILED at 780. Hunk #30 FAILED at 1180. 29 out of 30 hunks FAILED -- saving > rejects to file /tmp/reviewboard.3s7DQ8/tmpAp0ogH-new.rej > > Do you think some thing is wrong with the diff? > > > Thanks > Nilay > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > >
reviewboard.3s7DQ8.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
