-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/455/#review825
-----------------------------------------------------------


I don't see why this is necessary.
1. I don't think caches request address ranges, they are just the default 
responder on buses where they sit on the memory-side of the bus.
2. As far as the timing issue, I don't know whether this diff makes things more 
realistic, but if timing is an issue then we ought to be able to just change 
the cache code to make it pass uncached accesses through more quickly.

I don't think it's bad, necessarily, it just appears to be fixing something 
that I thought already worked, so if it's broken I'd like to understand better 
what the problem is before we commit to this being the fix.  My apologies if I 
missed some previous email discussion; I've been bad about keeping up with 
m5-dev email lately.

And why does it apply to x86 only?  Is there something special about x86 that 
requires this?

- Steve


On 2011-01-29 15:12:55, Gabe Black wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/455/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-01-29 15:12:55)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
> Nathan Binkert.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Config: Keep track of uncached and cached ports separately.
> 
> This makes sure that the address ranges requested for caches and uncached 
> ports
> don't conflict with each other, and that accesses which are always uncached
> (message signaled interrupts for instance) don't waste time passing through
> caches.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/inorder/InOrderCPU.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   src/cpu/o3/O3CPU.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   src/cpu/BaseCPU.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   configs/common/CacheConfig.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   configs/example/fs.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   configs/splash2/run.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   src/cpu/simple/AtomicSimpleCPU.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   src/cpu/simple/TimingSimpleCPU.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/inorder-timing.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/o3-timing-mp-ruby.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/o3-timing-mp.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/o3-timing-ruby.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/o3-timing.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/realview-simple-atomic.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/realview-simple-timing.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/simple-atomic-mp-ruby.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/simple-atomic-mp.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/simple-atomic.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/simple-timing-mp.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/simple-timing.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/t1000-simple-atomic.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/tsunami-o3-dual.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/tsunami-o3.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/tsunami-simple-atomic-dual.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/tsunami-simple-atomic.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/tsunami-simple-timing-dual.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/tsunami-simple-timing.py 31a04e5ac4be 
>   tests/configs/twosys-tsunami-simple-atomic.py 31a04e5ac4be 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/455/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabe
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to