-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/603/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan 
Binkert.


Summary
-------

sim: use nextCycle() for quiesceSkip function
the increment of curTick causes some compiler to complain on an assert in the 
event queue
scheduler. Since the code is only scheduling for the next cycle it seems safe 
to go ahead
and just use the cpu's function to trick the compiler. NOTE: this only comes up 
in opt/debug
builds since asserts are taken out of fast


Diffs
-----

  src/sim/pseudo_inst.cc c1c6f36e118e 

Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/603/diff


Testing
-------

This passed the simple-atomic, simple-timing, and o3 regressions tests for 
ARM_FS.


Thanks,

Korey

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to