----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/603/#review1020 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! src/sim/eventq.hh <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/603/#comment1389> Can you add a comment here explaining why you you're casting to UTick? - Nathan On 2011-03-26 10:38:18, Korey Sewell wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/603/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-03-26 10:38:18) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > sim: typecast Tick to UTick for eventQ assert > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/sim/eventq.hh d8587c913ccf > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/603/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > This passed the simple-atomic, simple-timing, and o3 regressions tests for > ARM_FS. > > > Thanks, > > Korey > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
