I am looking forward to it VERY MUCH! -Soumyaroop
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Gabriel Michael Black < [email protected]> wrote: > Nice work :-). Hopefully we'll get rid of those last vestiges of the Alpha > only days (hwrei, etc) one of these days. > > Gabe > > > Quoting Korey Sewell <[email protected]>: > > Hi all, >> A brief update for the few people interested in the InOrder model >> working in full system mode (okay maybe just me!). >> >> For ALPHA_FS, I've updated support for interrupt handling, fault >> handling, and alpha-specific functionality (e.g. hwrei) to the InOrder >> model. There are about 20 patches or so that I will eventually push to >> the repo but I'd rather get everything working first then push things >> bit by bit. >> >> The model is *maddeningly* close to booting linux. If the output >> messages are a indicator of progress, then out of 108 lines in our >> 10.linux-boot regression, 105 are printing out correctly before things >> break. Currently, it seems as though the model livelocks on a fault in >> the data translation buffer (e.g. DTB "dfault" on addr X, then 10000 >> cycles later the same fault on addr X, over and over). >> >> Unfortunately, I wont be able to get back to this until the early part >> of next week but in my view progress is coming along pretty good and >> is on track to be ready for the big ruby-m5 merge. >> >> That is all! >> -- >> - Korey >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
