Great work!
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Korey Sewell <ksew...@umich.edu> wrote: > For 1-4 wide, InOrder Cores running in ALPHA FS mode... Observe terminal > output: > "M5 console: m5AlphaAccess @ 0xFFFFFD0200000000 > Got Configuration 623 > memsize 8000000 pages 4000 > First free page after ROM 0xFFFFFC0000018000 > HWRPB 0xFFFFFC0000018000 l1pt 0xFFFFFC0000040000 l2pt 0xFFFFFC0000042000 > l3pt_rpb 0xFFFFFC0000044000 l3pt_kernel 0xFFFFFC0000048000 l2reserv > 0xFFFFFC0000046000 > kstart = 0xFFFFFC0000310000, kend = 0xFFFFFC0000855898, kentry = > 0xFFFFFC0000310000, numCPUs = 0x1 > CPU Clock at 2000 MHz IntrClockFrequency=1024 > Booting with 1 processor(s) > ... > Linux version 2.6.13 (h...@zed.eecs.umich.edu) (gcc version 3.4.3) #1 SMP > Sun Oct 8 .. > Brought up 1 CPUs > ... > init started: BusyBox v1.1.0 (2007.03.04-01:07+0000) multi-call binary > mounting filesystems... > EXT2-fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended > loading script... > "* > **Two Words: "Yes Sir!" > > *More Than Two Words: InOrder is booting Linux!!! > > Getting to this point took about >30 patches, so I have a lot of > patch-cleaning work to do before I can place it in the repo. > > Also, just because it boots doesn't mean I've tested it with any kind of > real workload suite (e.g. SPEC or Parsec). I don't have the bandwidth to > complete stress test through all the benchmarks and test but if someone > tries and something goes wrong, please post to the mailing list and I'll do > my best to help you debug. > > Either way, I think this is a good milestone and I'll be adding the patches > and the regression test for ALPHA_FS/10.linux_boot/InOrder-CPU within the > next week (or two) and then eventually updating more things in our > handy-dandy M5 status matrix: > http://m5sim.org/wiki/index.php/Status_Matrix > > The next big thing I want to get in InOrder before the "gem5" official merge > is complete is timing TLB translation and in the longer term microcode > support. I can't say exactly when those will be added (again, not enough > time for me to completely focus on this), but if anyone wants to try I have > a good idea of what needs to be done and can assist. > > -- > - Korey > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
