On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Gabe Black <gbl...@eecs.umich.edu> wrote:
> To clarify, is this signed/unsigned issue something we need to deal with
> before this patch goes in, or can it be dealt with separately later?

I'd like to see it handled before the patch is committed, mostly
because I'm still not 100% convinced that these changes don't break
something.  Also when something gets deferred like this there's always
the uncertainty of when/if it's going to get taken care of... nothing
personal, I'd feel the same way if it was my own patch.

gem5-dev mailing list

Reply via email to