Hello Ali, What do you mean with devices?, if you are talking about if I do any changes something in the code of the simulator, I have not done any changes. The value of event->getCount() is 4.
Thanks. 2008/12/11 Ali Saidi <[email protected]>: > It looks like a serialization bug to me. What devices are you using? > Just the defaults? Can you print out event->getCount() to see what the > value is? i imagine that some object is double executing a drain > event, but the count would say for sure. > > Ali > > > > On Dec 11, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Bob Nagel wrote: > >> Hello I am getting this error when I am running a simulation in FS >> this is what I am doing: >> >> I start the simulation in atomic model to load linux and I take a >> checkpoint to keep simulating in detail model when the script starts >> running: >> >> This is the command to take the checkpoint >> ./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt -d ./tmp/output configs/example/fs.py -b >> MyBench --checkpoint-dir=./checkpoint/ >> >> This is my rcS file: >> >> #!/bin/sh >> /sbin/m5 checkpoint >> /sbin/m5 switchcpu >> /sbin/m5 dumpstats >> /sbin/m5 resetstats >> cd /parsec/install/bin >> ./freqmine /parsec/install/inputs/freqmine/kosarak_250k.dat 220 >> echo "DONE :D" >> /sbin/m5 exit >> >> And when I restore from the checkpoint with this command I get this >> error: >> >> ./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt -d ./tmp/output configs/example/fs.py -b >> MyBench --caches --l2cache -s -w 200000000000 -r 1 >> --checkpoint-dir=./checkpoint/ >> >> switching cpus >> Switch at instruction count:0 >> info: Entering event queue @ 1815525533500. Starting simulation... >> Switching CPUS @ cycle = 1815525533500 >> Simulation ends instruction count:0 >> info: Entering event queue @ 1815525533500. Starting simulation... >> m5.opt: build/ALPHA_FS/python/swig/pyevent.cc:84: void >> cleanupCountedDrain(Event*): Assertion `event->getCount() == 0' >> failed. >> Program aborted at cycle 1815525533500 >> Aborted >> >> In my script I am running the simulation with 4 cpus, but the thing is >> that when I put only 1 cpu the simulation runs without any problem, is >> this a bug of the simulator?. I am using the latest stable version >> from three weeks ago. And another thing when I restore from the >> checkpoint I get many warns like this one: >> >> warn: Not unserializing >> 'system.switch_cpus_10.fuPool.FUList2.opList2': no section found in >> checkpoint. >> >> Thanks. >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
