Yes, that would work too. Probably a better solution for this case. It feels not as "pretty", but I suppose that doesn't matter. I guess I like symmetry too much.
Lisa On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a reason why we schedule an event on all the cpus? Would it > work just to schedule the event on cpu 0? > > Steve > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Lisa Hsu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Try the attached patch. > > > > To anyone interested: > > > > for the initial switch from atomic to timing is set at > > cpu[i].max_insts_any_thread = 1, for all cpu=i. the idea for > > max_insts_any_thread is that when the first cpu hits that value, an exit > > event is scheduled - but since in this case all N cores hit 1 in the > exact > > same cycle, 4 exit events are scheduled. > > > > so after the switch to timing, the first exit event has been dealt with > but > > there are still 3 more, which essentially kill your attempts to drain. > > > > this is a pretty silly fix, making the initial atomic phase last 100 > insts > > just to reduce the probability that this will never happen again, but > > doesn't rigorously remove that possibility. if anyone has a better idea > of > > how to fix this let me know. > > > > Lisa > > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Lisa Hsu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I'm working on this. Stay tuned. > >> > >> Lisa > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Eduardo Olmedo Sanchez > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> These are the changes that I did to the fs.py file: > >>> > >>> np = options.num_cpus = 4 > >>> > >>> test_sys.l2 = L2Cache(size = '4MB', assoc = 4, latency = '30ns') > >>> > >>> test_sys.cpu[i].addPrivateSplitL1Caches(L1Cache(size = '64kB', assoc > >>> = 2, latency = '2ns'), > >>> L1Cache(size = '64kB', > >>> assoc = 2, latency = '2ns')) > >>> > >>> I did not do any other changes to the source code. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Ali Saidi <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > Have you changed the default configuration any? It appears from your > >>> > command line that you would only get one cpu. > >>> > > >>> > Ali > >>> > > >>> > On Dec 12, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Bob Nagel wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Hello Ali, > >>> >> > >>> >> What do you mean with devices?, if you are talking about if I do any > >>> >> changes something in the code of the simulator, I have not done any > >>> >> changes. The value of event->getCount() is 4. > >>> >> > >>> >> Thanks. > >>> >> > >>> >> 2008/12/11 Ali Saidi <[email protected]>: > >>> >>> It looks like a serialization bug to me. What devices are you > using? > >>> >>> Just the defaults? Can you print out event->getCount() to see what > >>> >>> the > >>> >>> value is? i imagine that some object is double executing a drain > >>> >>> event, but the count would say for sure. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Ali > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Dec 11, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Bob Nagel wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>>> Hello I am getting this error when I am running a simulation in FS > >>> >>>> this is what I am doing: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> I start the simulation in atomic model to load linux and I take a > >>> >>>> checkpoint to keep simulating in detail model when the script > starts > >>> >>>> running: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> This is the command to take the checkpoint > >>> >>>> ./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt -d ./tmp/output configs/example/fs.py -b > >>> >>>> MyBench --checkpoint-dir=./checkpoint/ > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> This is my rcS file: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> #!/bin/sh > >>> >>>> /sbin/m5 checkpoint > >>> >>>> /sbin/m5 switchcpu > >>> >>>> /sbin/m5 dumpstats > >>> >>>> /sbin/m5 resetstats > >>> >>>> cd /parsec/install/bin > >>> >>>> ./freqmine /parsec/install/inputs/freqmine/kosarak_250k.dat 220 > >>> >>>> echo "DONE :D" > >>> >>>> /sbin/m5 exit > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> And when I restore from the checkpoint with this command I get > this > >>> >>>> error: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> ./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt -d ./tmp/output configs/example/fs.py -b > >>> >>>> MyBench --caches --l2cache -s -w 200000000000 -r 1 > >>> >>>> --checkpoint-dir=./checkpoint/ > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> switching cpus > >>> >>>> Switch at instruction count:0 > >>> >>>> info: Entering event queue @ 1815525533500. Starting > simulation... > >>> >>>> Switching CPUS @ cycle = 1815525533500 > >>> >>>> Simulation ends instruction count:0 > >>> >>>> info: Entering event queue @ 1815525533500. Starting > simulation... > >>> >>>> m5.opt: build/ALPHA_FS/python/swig/pyevent.cc:84: void > >>> >>>> cleanupCountedDrain(Event*): Assertion `event->getCount() == 0' > >>> >>>> failed. > >>> >>>> Program aborted at cycle 1815525533500 > >>> >>>> Aborted > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> In my script I am running the simulation with 4 cpus, but the > >>> >>>> thing is > >>> >>>> that when I put only 1 cpu the simulation runs without any > >>> >>>> problem, is > >>> >>>> this a bug of the simulator?. I am using the latest stable version > >>> >>>> from three weeks ago. And another thing when I restore from the > >>> >>>> checkpoint I get many warns like this one: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> warn: Not unserializing > >>> >>>> 'system.switch_cpus_10.fuPool.FUList2.opList2': no section found > in > >>> >>>> checkpoint. > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> Thanks. > >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>> >>>> m5-users mailing list > >>> >>>> [email protected] > >>> >>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>> >>>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> >>> m5-users mailing list > >>> >>> [email protected] > >>> >>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>> >>> > >>> >> _______________________________________________ > >>> >> m5-users mailing list > >>> >> [email protected] > >>> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > m5-users mailing list > >>> > [email protected] > >>> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> m5-users mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>> > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >
_______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
