If you are using GEMS, than the best list for discussion is the gems-users list.
If you are using gem5, then then the gem5-users list is best for discussion. Seems like you want to direct your question to the former list (gems) On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh < [email protected]> wrote: > I am using gems > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Korey Sewell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> are you using simics or are you using gem5? >> >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> I have a question about virtual and physical address in Simics and GEMS. >>> I want to find shared address between two threads. Therefore, I have >>> executed my two threads app. and logged all memory addresses (physical and >>> virtual address) that accessed by the considered threads. Then, number of >>> shared variable is obtained by physical and virtual addresses, separately. I >>> found that number of shared variable by virtual addresses is different with >>> physical addresses one. Could you tell me which of them is true? >>> I think finding the shared address must be done by virtual addresses. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gem5-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> - Korey >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gem5-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >> > > > > -- > Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > -- - Korey
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
