whoops....Gabe is right...gem5-users.

But if he gets into making a bunch of non-trivial bug fixes I would think
that would go to gem5-dev.

More straightforward usage issues go to gem5-users. At least that's how I
view it.

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
> m5-dev => gem5-dev, and regardless you should use gem5-users (like you
> are).
>
> Gabe
>
>
> On 07/30/11 04:54, Korey Sewell wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, it seems that since you asked for a patch and no one
> responded, then no one has the patch for what you're looking for. You'll
> have to dig into the code and add those stats yourself. Similar for the
> bug-fixing you describe later.
>
> If you do get into that, then m5-dev can help you debug as long as you
> provide details of what you are doing along the way (command lines, what you
> tried, what you theorize the problem to be, etc.)
>
>  On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Paolo Grani <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No one....
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>>
>> Il 26/07/2011 11:58, Paolo Grani ha scritto:
>>
>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>> i need some clarification about the ruby statistics.
>>> I read in a previous post that the miss counts for the ruby cache only
>>> works with the MOESI_hammer coherence protocol.
>>> I would like to know if there is some patch to get the
>>> MOESI_CMP_directory protocol working with this information.
>>> In fact when a try to run a simulation whit this protocol i get this
>>> output for any CacheMemory in Ruby:
>>>
>>>  "Cache Stats: system.l1_cntrl0.L1DcacheMemory
>>>  system.l1_cntrl0.L1DcacheMemory_total_misses: 0
>>>  system.l1_cntrl0.L1DcacheMemory_total_demand_misses: 0
>>>  system.l1_cntrl0.L1DcacheMemory_total_prefetches: 0
>>>  system.l1_cntrl0.L1DcacheMemory_total_sw_prefetches: 0
>>>  system.l1_cntrl0.L1DcacheMemory_total_hw_prefetches: 0"
>>>
>>>
>>> In addition i'm also interested in latency informations on memory
>>> accesses.
>>> Running a simulation always with MOESI_CMP_directory i get this:
>>>
>>> "miss_latency: [binsize: 8 max: 825 count: 19954053 average: 3.10522 |
>>> standard deviation: 3.91114 | 19923362 3729 6244 6396 3738 1081 119 79
>>> 121 88 87 31 31 27 34 30 36 31 35 371 2435 2496 957 663 874 529 110 29
>>> 27 19 21 17 13 19 16 12 15 16 11 7 9 4 5 5 7 3 9 7 1 5 2 3 0 4 2 3 3 0 1
>>> 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
>>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]"
>>>
>>>
>>> For what i can understand this information says  "how many requests took
>>> 1 cycle, 2 cycles, 3 cycles... to be accomplished" also reporting some
>>> aggregate information (count,average....).
>>> But the the coherence protocol models a 2-level cache architecture so i
>>> would like to know if this informations are for the L2 shared cache or
>>> for the L1 level.
>>> If the answer is L1 level this information is an aggregate of all the
>>> private L1 caches (i'm running a 8 cores simulation so  there are 8
>>> private L1 caches) or is specific for some L1 cache?
>>>
>>>
>>> Finally i found a patch that tries to convert the Ruby's stats to the
>>> M5-style Stat class.
>>> I can correctly compile the code  but when i try to run it a memory leak
>>> occurs.
>>> Someboy have tried to fix it?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank's in advance,
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ====================================================
>> The devil is in the details
>> ====================================================
>>
>> Ing. Paolo Grani
>> Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione
>> via Roma 56, 53100 Siena, Italia
>> Laboratorio di Architettura dei Calcolatori ---> int. 223
>>
>> mailto:[email protected]
>> http://www.dii.unisi.it
>> ====================================================
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> - Korey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing 
> [email protected]http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>



-- 
- Korey
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to