why?
-d is detailed

On 4/14/12, Malek Musleh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well first of all, you are not making first comparisons, as each of
> the runs you are using a different cpu type. So I think you should
> start with fixing that parameter first.
>
> Malek
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> For the old one, I use:
>> build/X86_SE/m5.fast configs/example/cmp.py  -F 20000000 --maxtick
>> 10000000000 -d --caches --l2cache -b h264_sss --prog-interval=1000000
>>
>> for the new one I use:
>> build/X86/m5.fast configs/example/cmp.py --cpu-type=detailed  -F
>> 20000000 --maxtick 10000000000 --caches --l2cache -b h264_sss
>> --prog-interval=1000000
>>
>> I attached the configs and stats. Thanks
>>
>> On 4/14/12, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> So, with 8613:712d8bf07020 you got and IPC of 1.54, and with some version
>>> near 8944:d062cc7a8bdf, you get an ipc of 0.093. Which CPU type are you
>>> using?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nilay
>>>
>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
>>>
>>>> The previous release is:
>>>> changeset:   8613:712d8bf07020
>>>> tag:         tip
>>>> user:        Nilay Vaish<[email protected]>
>>>> date:        Sat Nov 05 15:32:23 2011 -0500
>>>> summary:     Tests: Update stats due to addition of fence microop
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And the IPC is 1.541534
>>>>
>>>> However for the new release, I am not able to find the head:
>>>> mahmood@tiger:gem5$ hg head
>>>> abort: requirement 'dotencode' not supported!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/14/12, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> How much is the difference and which versions of gem5 are you talking
>>>>> about?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Nilay
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> In the new version, I see that the IPC of h264 (with sss input) is
>>>>>> very very low. However with the previous releases, this value is fine
>>>>>> and acceptable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you know how can I find the bottleneck? Which stat value shows the
>>>>>> weired behaviour?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ISA = x86
>>>>>> -F = 50,000,000
>>>>>> --maxtick = 10,000,000,000
>>>>>> L1 = 32kB, 4
>>>>>> L2 = 2MB, 16
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the IPC obtained is 0.093432
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you faced such result? Please let me know
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> // Naderan *Mahmood;
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> // Naderan *Mahmood;
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> // Naderan *Mahmood;
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>


-- 
--
// Naderan *Mahmood;
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to