I missed that, my mistake. I don't know what the cmp.py script is
doing as I don't have it in my repo, but if you look at the sim_insts
between the 2 stats file you posted,, there is a big difference:

new: sim_insts                                                    20767049
old:   sim_insts                                                    39724113

I would make sure the cpu type is not getting overridden somehow when
you do cpu_type=detailed by atomic/timing or something of the sort.

Malek

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]> wrote:
> why?
> -d is detailed
>
>
> On 4/14/12, Malek Musleh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Well first of all, you are not making first comparisons, as each of
>> the runs you are using a different cpu type. So I think you should
>> start with fixing that parameter first.
>>
>> Malek
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> For the old one, I use:
>>> build/X86_SE/m5.fast configs/example/cmp.py  -F 20000000 --maxtick
>>> 10000000000 -d --caches --l2cache -b h264_sss --prog-interval=1000000
>>>
>>> for the new one I use:
>>> build/X86/m5.fast configs/example/cmp.py --cpu-type=detailed  -F
>>> 20000000 --maxtick 10000000000 --caches --l2cache -b h264_sss
>>> --prog-interval=1000000
>>>
>>> I attached the configs and stats. Thanks
>>>
>>> On 4/14/12, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> So, with 8613:712d8bf07020 you got and IPC of 1.54, and with some version
>>>> near 8944:d062cc7a8bdf, you get an ipc of 0.093. Which CPU type are you
>>>> using?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nilay
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The previous release is:
>>>>> changeset:   8613:712d8bf07020
>>>>> tag:         tip
>>>>> user:        Nilay Vaish<[email protected]>
>>>>> date:        Sat Nov 05 15:32:23 2011 -0500
>>>>> summary:     Tests: Update stats due to addition of fence microop
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And the IPC is 1.541534
>>>>>
>>>>> However for the new release, I am not able to find the head:
>>>>> mahmood@tiger:gem5$ hg head
>>>>> abort: requirement 'dotencode' not supported!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/14/12, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> How much is the difference and which versions of gem5 are you talking
>>>>>> about?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Nilay
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> In the new version, I see that the IPC of h264 (with sss input) is
>>>>>>> very very low. However with the previous releases, this value is fine
>>>>>>> and acceptable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you know how can I find the bottleneck? Which stat value shows the
>>>>>>> weired behaviour?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ISA = x86
>>>>>>> -F = 50,000,000
>>>>>>> --maxtick = 10,000,000,000
>>>>>>> L1 = 32kB, 4
>>>>>>> L2 = 2MB, 16
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the IPC obtained is 0.093432
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have you faced such result? Please let me know
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> // Naderan *Mahmood;
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> // Naderan *Mahmood;
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> // Naderan *Mahmood;
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
>
> --
> --
> // Naderan *Mahmood;
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to