Hi Andreas, Thank you so much. Please let me ask you one more question. Are those addresses bit addresses or byte addresses?
Best, Jung -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hansson Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 11:44 PM To: gem5 users mailing list Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Cache trace flag Hi Jung, The addresses printed are physical addresses. Andreas From: Jinwook Jung <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, 3 September 2012 09:41 To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [gem5-users] Cache trace flag Hi all, I'm running gem5 with debug flags "Cache", and I got the trace results something like below. 1000037093000: system.l2: ReadExReq 34e1e440 miss 1000037093000: system.l2: Sending an atomic ReadExReq for 34e1e440 1000037093000: system.l2: Receive response: ReadExResp for addr 34e1e440 in state 0 1000037093000: system.l2: replacement: replacing 34c6e440 with 34e1e440: clean 1000037093000: system.l2: Block addr 34e1e440 moving from state 0 to 7 So my question is: Is the address "34e1e440" logical address or physical address? I would like to know what the address 34e1e440 stands for. Any comments or hint will be very helpful. Thank you! Best Regards, Jung -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
