Mr. Jung
 
Would you write me the total processes(Instruction a-z) of Cache trace flag 
execution on m5 please. 
 
with thanks
....
Musharaf

--- On Mon, 9/3/12, Andreas Hansson <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Andreas Hansson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Cache trace flag
To: "gem5 users mailing list" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, September 3, 2012, 7:43 AM


Hi Jung,

The addresses printed are physical addresses.

Andreas

From: Jinwook Jung <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, 3 September 2012 09:41
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [gem5-users] Cache trace flag

Hi all,

I’m running gem5 with debug flags “Cache”, and I got the trace results 
something like below.

1000037093000: system.l2: ReadExReq 34e1e440 miss
1000037093000: system.l2: Sending an atomic ReadExReq for 34e1e440
1000037093000: system.l2: Receive response: ReadExResp for addr 34e1e440 in 
state 0
1000037093000: system.l2: replacement: replacing 34c6e440 with 34e1e440: clean
1000037093000: system.l2: Block addr 34e1e440 moving from state 0 to 7

So my question is: Is the address “34e1e440” logical address or physical 
address?
I would like to know what the address 34e1e440 stands for.
Any comments or hint will be very helpful. Thank you!

Best Regards,

Jung

-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.

_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to