Other possible sources off the top of my head....

Prefetchers?
Wrong path loads that don't contribute to IPC?

Sent from my phone.
On May 9, 2013 5:06 AM, "Mitch Hayenga" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Trying to analyze stats like this is often more trouble than it's worth...
> But anyway, here is one way this could happen I think.   Write misses.  As
> long as the in order does not stall for the tlb translations,  it can still
> get memory level parallelism for its writebacks.  And if they missed in the
> L1 the latencies of each write would be quite high.  But their latencies
> would largely not impact performance.
>
> Sent from my phone.
> On May 9, 2013 4:20 AM, "Chao Zhang" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm using gem5 to simulating a cache optimization, but met some trouble.
>> Help me out, when you found my mistakes. Thanks!
>> It is configured as alpha inorder CPU with the build_opt given as
>> "ALPHA_MESI_CMP_directory", and the CPU and  caches are set as follows:
>>
>> options.cpu_type = 'inorder'
>> options.caches = 'caches'
>> options.l1d_size = '64kB'
>> options.l1i_size = '64kB'
>> options.l2cache = 'True'
>> options.l2_size = '1MB'
>> options.l3cache = 'True'
>>  options.l3_size = '8MB'
>>
>> My problem is that  when I look at the stats result for benchmark SPEC
>> cpu 2006 bzip2, I found the reduction of overall dcache miss latency(
>> 15619739000 ticks) is much larger than that of sim ticks (5569683000
>>  ticks). How could it be? If the CPU is inorder and the IPC is lease than 1,
>> the variance of L1 miss latency should roughly smaller than that of CPU
>> time. Note that optimizations I made did not influence the miss latency
>>  statistics.
>>
>> So what's the explanation?
>> And how can I get the "CPU time contribution Ratio of cache hierarchy"
>> from the simulator?
>>
>> Anybody's response is welcome!
>>
>> --
>> Chao Zhang
>> School of EECS, Peking University
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to