An update to this issue is to hear a feedback from someone who uses ALPHA binaries in SE mode. X86 is not as rich as ALPHA.
If IPC values are normal in ALPHA, then there is something wrong with X86 decoder. On 6/17/13, Manmohan Manoharan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jerry Backer <jbacke01 <at> students.poly.edu> writes: > >> >> >> I am using the most up to date gem5 (from development repository) with > detailed cpu-type for various cint >> 2006 benchmarks. >> However, the IPC for all the benchmarks are extremely low ( <= 0.1 for > most benchmarks). >> The binaries are 32-bit statically linked and have been used with other > simulators and presented >> reasonable >> ipc numbers. I also tried simulating with timing and also obtained low ipc >> > ( <0.01 for most benchmarks). >> I am simulating with se.py using the default configuration with caches and >> > l2cache enabled for detailed >> cpu type. >> >> Has anyone encountered this issue ? >> >> Thanks, >> > > I also find the same issue when I run the SPEC 2006 benchmarks. I am using > the X86 detailed model and statically linked binaries. I tried both the SSE2 > > as well as non-SSE2 compiled binaries on the corresponding gem5 versions. > However the results seem to be the same. Any updates on this would be very > helpful. > > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > -- Regards, Mahmood _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
