Hey GE ZHIGUO, I have tried to run parsec same benchmark with same input (blackscholes with simlarge input - in_64K.txt)through command line and measure it num of instruction by perf tool.
I am find that number of instruction executed is in range on 5000 x 10^6. while with GEM5 running parsec gives the num of instruction as 85 x 10^6 and execution time is around 15 min. so, i am feeling some thing wrong on how i am executing the parsec with GEM5. if you or someone in USER group know how to get correct results to run parsec with X86 pl. guide. I have used following 1. disk image on http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~parsec_m5/ 2. instructions as per http://gem5user.blogspot.com/2013/02/running-parsec-benchmarks-on-gem5.html -- A.K.T On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:32 AM, GE ZHIGUO <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Tewar > Some PARSEC benchmarks produce output files or prints. > You can diff the simulation outputs with those obtained from the direct > executions on top of desktop computers. > > Thanks! > > Zhiguo > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of AKT > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 5:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] GEM5 run with PARSEC blackscholes - Seems to be > early termination > > Hello Udit, GE ZHIGUO, > > I am seeing same type of output with PARSEC while running and it is > completed in 15 min. same as Udit shown in the earlier email. > > Can you guide me some thing how to know what results i am getting is > correct? > > Hope you can guide me > > Regards > A.K.Tewar > > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
