Hello, It takes around 1h30, some info: sim_seconds 0.633963 sim_insts 3035018348
I forgot to say that I modified the arm_detailed model to simulate an Cortex-A9. Regards, -- Fernando A. Endo, PhD student and researcher Université de Grenoble, UJF France 2014-03-03 21:18 GMT+01:00 Amrish Tewar <[email protected]>: > Hey Fernando A. Endo, > > How much time does it take with this sample input. can you put one or > two parameters like total number of instruction from stats.txt. > > AKT > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Fernando Endo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I ran the Blackscholes bench is gem5 for ARM without any problems. More > > info: > > > > PARSEC 3.0 > > Input set = simsmall > > gem5 Stable version of 2012/06 > > O3 CPU model (arm_detailed) > > FS-mode > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Fernando A. Endo, PhD student and researcher > > > > Université de Grenoble, UJF > > France > > > > > > > > 2014-02-21 16:47 GMT+01:00 Amrish Tewar <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hey GE ZHIGUO, > >> > >> I have tried to run parsec same benchmark with same input > >> (blackscholes with simlarge input - in_64K.txt)through command line > >> and measure it num of instruction by perf tool. > >> > >> I am find that number of instruction executed is in range on 5000 x > >> 10^6. while with GEM5 running parsec gives the num of instruction as > >> 85 x 10^6 and execution time is around 15 min. > >> > >> so, i am feeling some thing wrong on how i am executing the parsec with > >> GEM5. > >> > >> if you or someone in USER group know how to get correct results to > >> run parsec with X86 pl. guide. > >> I have used following > >> 1. disk image on http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~parsec_m5/ > >> 2. instructions as per > >> > >> > http://gem5user.blogspot.com/2013/02/running-parsec-benchmarks-on-gem5.html > >> > >> -- > >> A.K.T > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:32 AM, GE ZHIGUO <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Hi, Tewar > >> > Some PARSEC benchmarks produce output files or prints. > >> > You can diff the simulation outputs with those obtained from the > direct > >> > executions on top of desktop computers. > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > Zhiguo > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] > ] > >> > On Behalf Of AKT > >> > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 5:23 AM > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] GEM5 run with PARSEC blackscholes - Seems to > >> > be early termination > >> > > >> > Hello Udit, GE ZHIGUO, > >> > > >> > I am seeing same type of output with PARSEC while running and it is > >> > completed in 15 min. same as Udit shown in the earlier email. > >> > > >> > Can you guide me some thing how to know what results i am getting is > >> > correct? > >> > > >> > Hope you can guide me > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > A.K.Tewar > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > gem5-users mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > gem5-users mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gem5-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gem5-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
