Hello,

The cycles in stats.txt may refer to a 1 ps (pico second).

--
Fernando A. Endo, PhD student and researcher

Université de Grenoble, UJF
France



2014-02-12 18:39 GMT+01:00 Summer <[email protected]>:

> Another quick question, in the cache statistics, the avg_miss_latency for
> L3 is around 380000 cycles. I cannot explain this number. Why does it need
> so many cycles? The miss rate of L3 is about 20%.
>
>
>
> On 02/12/2014 09:33 AM, Summer wrote:
>
>> Yes. direct mapped L4 is better until I increase L4 size to 1024M, 32
>> associative L4 and direct mapped L4 have similar miss rate.
>>
>> On 02/12/2014 12:06 AM, GE ZHIGUO wrote:
>>
>>> Can you increase the cache size so that the cache miss rate is within 8%
>>> to see whether
>>> direct map cache still has lower cache miss rate?
>>>
>>> Zhiguo
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> On Behalf Of Summer
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:01 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [gem5-users] cache statistics
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am working on a project to improve the last level cache performance
>>> and we want to simulate 4 levels of cache in gem5. However, when I
>>> simulate using SPEC CPU 2006 on 1 timing cpu, higher associative L4
>>> turns out higher miss rate. For example, a 256MB, 32 associative L4 gets
>>> miss rate 38.7% while 256MB, direct mapped L4 gets miss rate 20%. I am
>>> pretty confused by this result but I have tried several runs and got the
>>> same results.
>>> Does anyone have any idea about this?
>>> Your help is greatly appreciated!
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to