OK it seems I have to setup that. I thought the ICS bbench is a good place for tests. Lets move on then...
Regards, Mahmood On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Andreas Hansson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > gem5.fast does not have any assertions. > > As I already mentioned, I’d suggest to forget all about ICS and instead > follow the instructions here: http://www.gem5.org/Android_KitKat and > here: http://www.gem5.org/WA-gem5. > > That enables you to run a wide range of workloads, using Workload > Automation on Android KitKat. > > Andreas > > From: gem5-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Mahmood > Naderan <[email protected]> > Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, 28 December 2015 at 08:43 > To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]> > Subject: [gem5-users] Error on gem5.debug but no error on gem5.fast > > Hi, > If I run bbench with gem5.debug, I immediately get an error in the code > however, gem5.fast doesn't fail at that point. In fact it will fail after > so many ticks. > > A bit strange... Any idea on that? I haven't modified the code yet. > > > gem5.debug > > warn: DTB file specified, but no device tree support in kernel > **** REAL SIMULATION **** > warn: Existing EnergyCtrl, but no enabled DVFSHandler found. > info: Entering event queue @ 0. Starting simulation... > warn: Device system.membus.badaddr_responder accessed by read to address > 0x10009018 size=4 > gem5.debug: build/ARM/cpu/simple/atomic.cc:378: virtual Fault > AtomicSimpleCPU::readMem(Addr, uint8_t*, unsigned int, unsigned int): > Assertion `!pkt.isError()' failed. > Program aborted at tick 30000 > --- BEGIN LIBC BACKTRACE --- > build/ARM/gem5.debug(_Z15print_backtracev+0x23)[0x116b887] > build/ARM/gem5.debug(_Z12abortHandleri+0x5f)[0x1181581] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0xfcb0)[0x7f378047fcb0] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35)[0x7f377efac0d5] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x17b)[0x7f377efaf83b] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2ed9e)[0x7f377efa4d9e] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2ee42)[0x7f377efa4e42] > build/ARM/gem5.debug(_ZN15AtomicSimpleCPU7readMemEmPhjj+0x449)[0x1509433] > build/ARM/gem5.debug(_ZN17SimpleExecContext7readMemEmPhjj+0x52)[0x1516e4e] > > build/ARM/gem5.debug(_Z13readMemTimingI11ExecContextjESt10shared_ptrI9FaultBaseEPT_PN5Trace10InstRecordEmRT0_j+0x4d)[0x222469b] > > build/ARM/gem5.debug(_Z13readMemAtomicI11ExecContextjESt10shared_ptrI9FaultBaseEPT_PN5Trace10InstRecordEmRT0_j+0x5d)[0x2224525] > > build/ARM/gem5.debug(_ZNK10ArmISAInst27LOAD_IMM_AY_PN_SN_UN_WN_SZ47executeEP11ExecContextPN5Trace10InstRecordE+0x1da)[0x21846ca] > build/ARM/gem5.debug(_ZN15AtomicSimpleCPU4tickEv+0x5c8)[0x150a41a] > > > > > > > > But gem5.fast passes that tick number. The command I use is: > > build/ARM/gem5.fast configs/example/fs.py -b bbench-ics > --kernel=vmlinux.smp.mouse.arm --frame-capture > > build/ARM/gem5.debugconfigs/example/fs.py -b bbench-ics > --kernel=vmlinux.smp.mouse.arm --frame-capture > > > Regards, > Mahmood > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
