Besides, while my instrumented code in the "schedTimingResp" function works
well when leveraging the system call mode, I find the "schedTimingResp"
function is never executed in the full-system simulation mode. Am I missed
anything here?

This is the command I use:

./build/X86/gem5.opt --debug-flags=CacheDebug
--debug-file=cacheDebug.out.gz configs/example/fs.py
--disk-image=/home/test/work/x86_full_system/disks/linux-x86.img
--kernel=/home/test/work/x86_full_system/binaries/x86_64-vmlinux-3.2.1
--caches

By inserting some printf at the beginning of function "schedTimingResp ", I
am pretty sure this function is never invoked...

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Shuai Wang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Majid,
>
> Thank you so much for your detailed information. I strongly appreciate
> that.
>
> I tried to update the code as you said, and it works fine to dump the
> information in the C++ code. However, I am still confused to interpret the
> "cache state" information at this step. Could you please take a look at the
> following questions and shed some lights on it? Thank you!
>
> The first question is that I can never observe a "cache miss":
>
> So what I am basically doing right now, as you suggested, is to check the
> conditions in the context of each "cpuSidePort->schedTimingResp" to
> decide whether the current memory addressing leads to a hit or miss.
> However, after running multiple test cases (including some small binaries
> and mediam size GNU Coreutils binaries), all I can find is the "hit" 
> (schedTimingResp
> at line 742 of the cache.cc) and schedTimingResp at line 1454 of the
> cache.cc. Basically I cannot find any "miss" (schedTimingResp at line 801
> of the cache.cc).  Am I missed anything here?
>
> The second question is still about the interpretation of the cache state:
>
> If I understood correctly,  given a N-bit memory address, it is dissected
> into the following three parts in a memory access:
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
> The "set index" is used to locate the cache set in which the data may be
> stored, and the tag is used to confirm that the data currently indeed
> presents in one of the cache lines in that cache set. In other words, I
> understand that the "cache state" (hit; miss; etc.) should be associated
> with each cache set regarding every memory addressing.
>
> Given the above context, I would like to confirm that the captured
> "hit/miss" surely represents the cache state of the accessed cache set. Or
> it is actually something towards the cache lines?
>
> Am I clear on this? Any suggestion and advice would be appreciated! Thank
> you!
> Sincerely,
> Shuai
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Majid Namaki Shoushtari <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Shuai,
>>
>> I don't think Jason meant that you need to add a function to Caches.py.
>> You will need to add something to the C++ class (src/mem/cache/cache.hh/cc).
>>
>> I'm not sure what kind of information you need to dump, but basically all
>> of the incoming requests from CPU are received here:
>> "Cache::CpuSidePort::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)"
>> and all of the responses to CPU are happening anywhere there is a call
>> to: "cpuSidePort->schedTimingResp". There is currently four places that
>> responses to CPU are scheduled. If you read the code, it's relatively easy
>> to figure out which call site covers what condition (hit, miss, uncacheable
>> access, etc).
>>
>> If you need to dump this information for one (some) specific cache(s)
>> only, one way of doing it is to pass a boolean variable and make it
>> conditional based on the value of that variable. For that you will need to
>> add the variable to Caches.py and possibly CacheConfig.py.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Majid
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Shuai Wang <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Jason,
>>>
>>> Thank you so much for your reply. Could you please elaborate more on how
>>> to "implement a function in Caches.py to dump the data"? As far as I can
>>> see, there are only some cache parameters defined in this scripts.. I
>>> really have no idea how should I bridge the code there with the runtime
>>> cache state (my focus is the L1 D Cache)...
>>>
>>> I am not a system person and I am sincerely sorry if it is actually
>>> quite obvious... Thank you so much in advance!
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Shuai
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Jason Lowe-Power <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Shuai,
>>>>
>>>> There is currently nothing built into gem5 to dump the cache state
>>>> (unless you're using Ruby in which case you can look at the code to take a
>>>> checkpoint in the RubySystem class and the CacheTrace class). However, it
>>>> should be pretty simple to dump the data in the classic caches. You would
>>>> need to get a pointer to all of the caches, then add a function to the
>>>> Cache class that dumps the data. You may be able to leverage the DDUMP
>>>> macro which formats data in a reasonable way. Or, if you're only going to
>>>> be using code to consume the output, you can look into the protobuf support
>>>> in gem5 for dumping/consuming data.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:38 PM Shuai Wang <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear list,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am using the full-system simulation of gem5 to analyze the cache
>>>>> access of some x86 binary code. I have been able to add a monitor between
>>>>> the CPU and the L1 data cache to track all the cache access when executing
>>>>> the binary code on the simulated OS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently, I am thinking to go one step further and dump the cache
>>>>> state during the execution of the binary code. After a quick search 
>>>>> online,
>>>>> I am unable to find some useful information, and I am wondering if it is
>>>>> actually possible to do so..?
>>>>>
>>>>> Could anyone provide some pointers regarding this task? Thank you in
>>>>> advance!
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Shuai
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Majid Namaki Shoushtari
>> PhD Candidate
>> Department of Computer Science
>> University of California, Irvine
>> Irvine, CA 92697
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~anamakis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to